Activist Blog
Facebook
Twitter
 

2021-02-06 ::: REPORT ::: Analysis of the scientific basis for Ontario, Canada’s mandatory face masking and physical distancing law, 2020

The article is organized into the following sections:

    Summary
    Purpose and context
    Mandatory covering of the “mouth, nose and chin”
    Logic of the statutory exemptions from mask wearing
    Logic of the statutory general provisions
    Schedule 2: Specific Rules, regulatory absurdity in every sector
    Increased transmission and disease severity induced by the Regulation, and collateral deaths
    Endnotes / References


Summary

I find that the transmission mitigation provisions of Regulation 364/20 of the Reopening Ontario (A Flexible Response to COVID-19) Act, 2020 are arbitrary and nonsensical, in light of actual knowledge about transmission of viral respiratory diseases, including COVID-19.  Given hard evidence of harm from the measures themselves, if Ontario was a science-based society, the government would apply the precautionary principle by declaring a moratorium on all transmission-mitigation regulations, until policy-grade studies prove their worth in a rigorous harm-benefit appraisal framework.


Downloads:


Links:


VIEW OF DOWNLOAD:
OCLA-Report-2021-1--4th science review for covid policy - Reg-364-20----7f.pdf